And it should be noted regarding its interpretation, why the commentator chose to emphasize the praise of the storyteller in the Exodus story more than his colleague's. According to his version, it is possible to interpret the praise based on the act itself, as he tells it with embellishment and additional detail beyond the obligation, and it is worthy of praise for this. There is no need to praise him simply because his colleague is inherently better.

Perhaps the precise wording of the Haggadah led the commentator to interpret it this way, as he wrote: "This one is praiseworthy," whereas he could have simply written: "Anyone who tells the story of the Exodus is praiseworthy," without using this specific phrase. It implies that the Haggadah author intended to compare the style of his storytelling against his colleague's, and to praise him for having a more praiseworthy narrative style than his colleague.